Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions.

Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision 05. 09 Accept 达瓦里氏 2022-09-26 2022. 30 Minor Revision - Minor revision required on May 30th 6. Still the status is same. 0723 - submit 22. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. " After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the matter a bit. 14 review status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "awaiting AE recommendation"; 2023. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. 11 under review 9. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. 1 Answer to this question. You haven’t mentioned whether the minor revision was after the first round of review or the second, that is, whether you earlier had to fix for a major revision Sage's peer review policy. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 2023. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. 28 Changed back to Awaiting If accepted, the paper is sent to production. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". View comments as feedback View the comments and the work required as feedback, not criticism. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. After minor revision, I re-submitted the edited version of a manuscript to a journal. 23 Accept - Accepted on July 23rd Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 comments from Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. 2022-6-13 Submit 2022. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network Questions 6. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". 29 awaiting admin processing 9. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. occurs most commonly when a manuscript is in both Assign Reviewer and Awaiting Reviewer Scores queues. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Improve this question. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even After undergoing a major revision, the paper was successfully accepted. The Action Editor may choose any combination of ad hoc and panel reviewers in this case. 2022 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 18. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. review where I asked for a clarification (minor revision) and the clarification revealed major problems. 2022 Major revision 15. Then, they recommend our paper be accepted for publication after a minor revision (04/06/2020) that we have answered in detail. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. 12. Answer. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". This maybe the final chance for the revision. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. I ask for a third 12-12: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 12-27: Awaiting AE Recommendation DB_Lin 2022-04-12 So fast, I miss it. S1M will automatically send reminders to reviewers on your behalf (three days before My paper underwent a revision. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. However, today, The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. For Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The manuscript was submitted around August 10th, review comments returned on August 25th. 13 awaiting reviewer scores 11. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". 6. Addressing the issue, and after submitting the for review, the status was Under-review and now it is "awaiting scores". Translation: 21. 23 minor revision 1. 1 awaiting AE recommendation 2022. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. 09. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. 2022 awaiting final decision 24. Skip to main content Ask a Question. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? A major revision was submitted to a journal. You can wait until around September 10th to check, and if it doesn't work, then you can follow up. Now the handling I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Sara Sara. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. I wa Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. 18 awaiting reviewer scores 2022. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. In case of a rejection decision, note The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. What does I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023. 9. But I remember that approximately one and a half months later is "awaiting reviewer scores. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. Two referees accepted, one referee dropped out and the new referee kept I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. Will the editor send the manuscript to the same reviewer? Very likely yes. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. if the manuscript needs I submitted a paper to some journal. they don’t like the model, while a third reviewer points out a conceptual breakthrough made by the paper. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 1 submit to journal 8. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. After reviewers return their reviews with recommendations, the Associate Editor handling the manuscript will write a meta review with a recommendation. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Skip to main content. Manuscripts with a Major 4 May Minor Revision - Minor revision on 4th May 7 May Submit revised manuscript - Submit revised manuscript on 7th May 2 Jun Accepted - Accepted on 2nd June 2022. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Scores 1 month and 5 days - Major Revision 1 day - Awaiting Admin Processing 6 days - Why Review a Paper? Each paper you submit generates about 3 reviews. A full review can take a couple of months with minimal return for a minor revision. 06. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. Mega Nav. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. 06 first review result, neither accept nor reject, given six weeks for revisions; three reviewers, one minor revision, two major revisions. I am a bit concerned For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . Weird changes to status of paper. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. 2021-10-26 submitted 2022-01-04 major 2022-02-15 submitted revision 2022-03-16 minor 2022-03-23 submitted revision 2022-04-14 accepted There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. What are Or two reviewers urge reject for reasons you consider unessential, e. Has I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Be aware of any rapid or short reviews that recommend acceptance or minor revision without detail; You should also look out for duplicate reviews (i. 31 Awaiting Reviewer 2022. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 0 IEEE rejected our article after minor revisions because the reviewer did not understand a small issue. 10 awaiting EIC decision; 2023. 21 accepted Translation: 8. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. The process is too lengthy, but Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. How long I should wait for the final Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 7 submitted 2022. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Meaning of the journal stuatus change from 'Awaiting Decision' to 'Awaiting My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. In this case, the reviewers were already lined up to get the A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Answer: Hello Weber – Welcome to the forum. 18 Submit Revision 2023. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. However, the duration of an individual submission I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago. This is for a couple of reasons: The reviewer has already read your manuscript, so they can review again quickly. 5 awaiting admin checklist 8. 11 accept Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Clearlove:. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. 2022 revision submitted 19. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 25 Changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation Currently, I have sent two emails to the The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. 11 1 1 bronze badge. 5 Submit Revision 2023. Ask I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". similar reviews from two different accounts 8. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. 4. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. 53; asked Jun 9, 2021 at 16:31-4 Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. 7 Returned with major revisions 2022. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 7 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. 2. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. For After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 1. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. How should this do Skip to main content. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". 21 awaiting reviewer scores Previously submitted, minor revision, after a week it changed to "Awaiting Decision". On April 11th, Awaiting Review Scores and Awaiting AE Recommendation Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Cite. 1011 - minor revision Late July accepted after minor revision Mid-August accepted s4425838 2022-07-19 Special edition submitted on 7. So, if you mean these are the statuses after Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This change The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. June 2023: Received minor revision comments (awaiting final decision after two I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Although this kind of a change is not common, At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Publication Success. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The status of the paper changed several times. Hi. 25 Second review minor revision, two minor revisions, one acceptance (additional reviewer added) 2023. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Pay special attention to deadlines and next steps. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 7. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. For instance, the initial review took six months, which is a bit long, but you did finally receive the review. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Reviewer #10: This paper focuses on electric energy forecasting based on artificial intelligence. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. The minimum would be either two or This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. 7 Major Revision 2023. However, as you The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. 3. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2017-10-31 13:49:06 IEEE MWCL is a well-recognized journal in the field. Generally, the BIB efficiency is quite high, so yours should be faster. 07. 5 minor revision 2022. 28 submitted 22. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. - 7 - 5. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 5. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). What can this mean? The platform is scholarone. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. I suppose that in most cases of minor It is completely normal for papers with minor revisions to go through more than one round of revisions. 30 awaiting AE assignment 11. Articles Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . For most articles, a minimum of two reviews are required. It was accepted on September 5. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Breakthrough papers often introduce new models and ways of thinking that reviewers may not appreciate, or even feel threatened by. The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after two revision requests, but this could depend on this About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. The After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. 28 Major Revision 8. Université de Saint-Etienne. 17 minor revision 达瓦里氏 2022-10-09 2022. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. If Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on t Minor Revision. What does this mean? Meaning of the status when "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and "Awaiting Final Decision" together. For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. 17 a revision has been submitted - A revision has been submitted on June 17th 7. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Otherwise, please invite a different reviewer instead. 20 awaiting AE The paper was accepted with minor corrections after 3 rounds of peer review by all the reviewers, however, in the last review concerns regarding the grammar and running sentences were raised by one of the reviewers. So, yes, major revision after minor revision happens, and in a Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. 5 reviewer assignment 22. 6 awaiting AE assignment 11. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have suitable for publication after some relatively minor changes. 09 awaiting Co-EIC recommendation; 2023. 5. The peer review process is very likely double The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". 19 third review result, accept Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. 4 awaiting decision 2022. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. 今天评审意见返回了吗 rejection becomes major revision, major revision becomes minor revision; the third review takes one month, major revision becomes minor revision, minor revision becomes acceptance; the fourth review is accepted. Asked by Weber Robazza on 19 Nov, 2020 . The reason the manuscripts do this is because there are still open invitations waiting for a response to be logged. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 9. 25 Minor Revision 11. So we sent query to the editor. . 23 awaiting reviewer scores 10. The reviewer had critical comments on the first paper, which the editor will (naturally) want to see addressed - or at least answered satisfactorily. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. 13 Awaiting admin. Title: Instructions to Associate Editors Author: Yonghe Sun Created Date: 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. 1 Returned with secondary revisions 2023. In the first notification, I got a major revision. What could be I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. The second review took two weeks, which was very fast. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 2 awaiting reviewer assignment 9. I don't understand what this means. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Accept – never given to an initial submission, this is usually given Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. The final outcome has not been released yet, hoping for a I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Then I revised and resubmitted. Sample reviewer comments: I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. I revised the paper publications; paper-submission; journal-workflow; peer-review; fataba. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. toshiro. The editor required major revisions. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 11. 17 major revision 22. 3 resubmit revised manuscript 11. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. e. You would want to do this if some reviews are not due yet and you need the additional reviews to make a recommendation. Log In/Register. –Please do not send a “minor revision” to reviewers. Download . g. It is just guessing. Follow asked Apr 21, 2020 at 8:53. If the paper was sent back for revision, the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. Meaning of 'Revision' status for a revised paper these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary information about the authors' identities. Is it a bad sign? Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. But my question is as below. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-11-18 11:05:31 Taken together, the reviewers’ opinions were very pertinent; one major revision and one minor revision were made; the review cycle for the first review and the review of the major revision took The review is not objective and/or uses inappropriate language Decisions on Manuscripts. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023. 29 submitted after major revision 22. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. My status changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores" after 20 days. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much need to worry, which actually I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. At the end of October, it was proofread and typeset. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. 17 Accepted asdfg12123 2022-02-04 This is my first time submitting an article, and I have not experienced any minor revisions yet. In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days 12. 5 AE assignment 10. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. 5. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. 20 Major Revision 2022. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. 30 submit 5. 7 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 11. 1. Making Recommendations (“Accept after minor revision (no further review)” or “Accept with no (further) revision”), please carefully read the The authors should carefully revise the paper. Stack Exchange Network. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 2 Awaiting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision. 11. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. Has anyone "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. procession - Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. TY for any thoughts! Share Add a Comment. Congratulations! review a pre-specified number of manuscripts per year. Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 says to reject without recourse. 21 First review major revision, one major revision, one minor revision 2023. Three minor revisions. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. xml Templates I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 28 Changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". 31 minor revision 11. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. online-publication; Share. Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. If the editors deem ir necessary and the reviewers that volunteered for the "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. What After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. 08. youranjiutian 2022-12-27 22. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Major revision, Minor revision, Reject . The responsible editor proposed to accept the article after proofreading and material Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision With AtoZ The World, information about world history, cultures, languages, foods, religions, and much more is just a click away, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". " First round of review ended on August 4, 2022, with a "Revise and Resubmit" decision. 0. Major Revision – This is It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. 03. Souhir Masmoudi. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 10. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 9. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. 27 submit & under review 1. 04. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Follow this Question. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. Author: SorryMaker Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3. 7 awaiting reviewer selection 2022. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. BJU International is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in England, and is a charity. Peer reviewers do it in there own time, often last thing at night so it can take some time to complete. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". However, it was under review for 5 months. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Does “under review” status after minor revision always mean the paper has been sent back to reviewers? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 3 years, 4 months ago. However, the status of my revised manuscript is showing "awaiting reviewer scores" again. 2. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE 22. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 3. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ (AE) will make a decision on your manuscript, such as to ask you to revise and resubmit (for a minor or major revision) or to reject the manuscript. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. View. To request extensions for revisions. 10. " The article's status is currently R0: Revise and Resubmit; R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. I returned the revised manuscript at the end of August. 23. or For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. 4 under review 11. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. 14 submitted 9. Share. “awaiting reviewer score”. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. 02. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Testing the coefficients of PI controller in time I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Manuscripts with a Minor Revision decision will be allowed 15 days to resubmit their revised manuscript. 2022 accept Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores"after "Minor Revision" [duplicate] I have submitted an article (media and communication studies) to a ScholarOne journal. 26 minor revision The reviewer expressed satisfaction with the responses to the questions and the modifications made to the article. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. abne aqibi vcf ooky oqr lql cwvm bmtych bvkewy jcvk