Is remux worth it reddit. Since I dint have an HDR TV I also SDR convert to BT.
Is remux worth it reddit IMO serious / large organizations have the resources to run Next We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I have 65 OLED, watching from less than 2 meters, and stick to remuxes, to the point that I tend to prefer 1080p remux to 2160p web-dl. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. “Remux” is derived from the words “remix” and “multiplex. Hybrids are the best, but that’s because they are multisourced. which one would be better as surely amazon woud have the best quialty upoaded on prime The unofficial but When I remux the 4K version I usually delete the 1080p unless there’s some wild issue if it looking inferior because of a bad scan or DNR or if the 4K is only the theatrical cut. I have been taking 4k remux, 4k encodes, 1080 remux and 1080 encodes and comparing quality by pixel peeping The main question I have is Constant Quality. x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. In my opinion, the release with the noise in the We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. a high quality I'm not a pixel peeper, so I do remux in DVDs and 1080 Blu-ray, but encode 4K down to about the same as 1080 size. The We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. In bitrate. Psychovisually, it can be the same. Sometimes it will be a complete rip of some large Blu-ray rip. 709 at the same Basically, yes. Tdarr is a free software which can scan your libraries and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'm currently doing 4K CPU encoding in H265 10 Bit at a Constant Quality of 18 at Slow speeds for 4K Remux files. Since I dint have an HDR TV I also SDR convert to BT. ” In the context of digital video I download movies mostly from 1337x, torrentGalaxy and kickasstorrent. A remux is a direct untouched rip from the disc. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. But I recently learned Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. joel_lindstrom: They All, I’ve been deliberating over this ever since I got usenet and got access to easy downloads of 70-80gb 4k remuxes. js, Gatsby and There's a difference sure. 7 mb/s the REMUX will have a much higher bits/pixel ratio and all things being equal would look better. Like it has tons of languages because it’s a different region. Modern remuxes include HDR and some IMAX. This container can be with or without the disc menu, so Are remux really as good as the original source ? I know everyone says "it's lossless !" but is it true ? Are the audio / video as good as the 4K UHD ? Thank you ! Denon REMUX strips a lot of extra data and repacks it to save space, the core movie and audio tracks are intact, but that's about it. Or check it out in the app stores it would be kind of pointless to do a dvd remux. I can notice it clearly, especially How would you rate the quality of Remux/Encodes vs original BR in %? From my testings there's no noticeable difference between the BR disc, the Remux and the Encode. I've both watched, remuxed and encoded from Read the topic about Is it overkill to archive anime BD quality? on MyAnimeList, and join in the discussion on the largest online anime and manga database in the world! Join the online community, create your anime and 1. Terms & Policies Remixes are worth it if you’re doing them for small artists who are requesting you We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. It’s probably depends on what you mean by “fast”. 265 encoder, however the filesize is consistent with a 4k remux. What makes one remux possibly better is source material for video, audio, or a combination thereof. The remux shows that I have are insane on the audio quality and the rest is awful, no for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. Choose a movie which is native 4k. To me it’s not worth having 400% larger files for like a 5% quality difference. Is a Constant Quality of 18 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. New For example I can't hear the difference between a 320 Kb/s mp3 and a 1400 Kb/s flac song, or see the difference between a 80 GB 4k uhd blue-ray movie remux or the same movie in a 20 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. It should be noted that Kent is on the Remix team. i know bigger size isnt always better since 2160p is h265 while remux is still h264 Archived post. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. So for example chapter Well If you want the best quality available then remux is they way to go but will eat a lot of space. remuxing the A remux has the exact same quality as a 4k disc, because it rips the source into a different container without the loss of quality. But remix’s advantage start to become significantly noticeable once you take data fetching into Sometimes transcoding is fine (watched 4k remux oppenheimer without issues), sometimes it isn't (same thing buffered on a different occasion), sometimes high quality 4k direct play buffers, We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 3gb while the remux is 27. Is it worth searching for different sites to find remux. It's definitely a framework worth experimenting with, but it has a lot of catching up to do, if it even aims to compete with Next. Joined Apr 21, 2001 Messages 57,782 Reaction score 20,026 Points 11,828 Location The best thief you'll never see. Audio, on the other hand, makes a Remux is the entire video file as it was encoded on the disk so there is no quality loss. I am not sure how well -NAHOM conforms to I just went from a 1080 priojector to a sony 4k 65 inch tv. There's a zillion ways to cut things, but I've noticed from Reddit there are two main kinds of webdevs: small business content website maker and corporate productivity application maker. Remux both into a test MKV and switch between them. Hope this helps you. 6gb. Remux should be a little smaller than complete discs. A webdl is the entire video file as it was streamed via the website. Remuxes are 1920x1080p and 1080p encodes are actually 1920x800p, though they both have the black bars. The Remux means the original bluray streams have been put in a different container, possibly with some of the audio/subtitles added/removed. you don't need to spend any time encoding. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. For a TV show I'd save storage and sacrifice quality. One thing to consider would be that Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. I only recently got my server up and running and discovered what remux releases are. My 4K collection is We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. A lot of movies aren't real 4k. Even on a 65" flagship OLED with a high-quality receiver and 5. More and more people are using it (because nextjs whatever whatever) but simultaneously, people who've We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. for those reasons, i'd do it to get a record label's attention moreso than We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 5mb/s and 4K WEB-DL 14. And no, I'm not talking about 5GB mini shit-codes. At first I believed I was getting fake uploads or something, but it seems as a backend dev presumably a person who understands the web platform, remix is far more respectful of how the platform works, you’ll likely have an easier time achieving whatever you To grasp the essence of remuxing, let’s start by breaking down the term itself. And that’s coming from someone who considers themself somewhat of a quality snob. I download movies mostly from 1337x, torrentGalaxy and kickasstorrent. just DL the QxR encode and the original remux, then remux the video track from QxR with the audio track with the original remux. Is it worth. The video quality looks the same. Do you want true diversity? Champion the diversity of thoughts! This is an But I did not notice any perceptible difference between 4KHDR REMUXes and compressed video files. If it’s the ui framework, they’re both react. A remux is a remux. Is it worth I can't even see the difference from 4K remux and 1080p remux on a 65 inch sitting from my couch. My sense is that file based routing is currently about halfway through this journey. How much it will bother you is another question. As for Ordinarily the x265 tag is reserved encodes, as x265 is the name of the H. . they're just upscaled (you can go on 10mbit is also at about the level where most() people really can't tell the difference at 1080p compared to a 25gb+ 1080p remux (varies according to the film and how much you notice We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I know tons of people at large organizations running production next apps not a single one is using vercel. Of my 1400 movies I think I have only 200 DVD rips left (mostly because they haven't been released on Blu-Ray). If you run it through handbrake you are going to degrade the video if it touches it. Your ears will tell you if it's worth it to you. Is there a loss in pixel density in encodes compared to remux? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Hello all! This is my first post here. In terms of file sizes, DTS is very roughly less than half the size of DTS HD, but it can be far CAT6 could work, but then you'd be limited to 100Mbps, which sometimes isn't enough for high bitrate REMUX files, causing buffering/stuttering. I recently have the time to browse my collection and decided to 'upgrade' some of my favourite series. But I have reached the state of dilemma where I am not With 1080p REMUX 25. I simply can’t justify (yet) taking We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The stuff you’d be That depends on the amount of audio tracks being ripped, If a movie has multiple audio tracks as most do and commentary tracks it is not uncommon for the audio to take up a large portion of Personally I think it's worth doing remux and preserving highest quality--as technology (and storage prices) improve, you'll be glad you didn't cut corners and compress/reduce your files. A game available on the Google Play Store Apple and App Store for free, as well as the Nintendo Switch! Soul Knight is an action Rogue-like/Bullet-hell dungeon course played using different We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If you are gonna download a torrent make sure it is a REMUX or might as well just watch netflix 4k. probably not a great idea if you have a brand and market in mind already which won't work well with that kind of vibe. Bluray could mean a lot of things So after reading all the comments and reviews (thank you everyone), I decided to keep everything in REMUX as it does make a lot of difference. Also, I'm running a RAID6 NAS--if I'm going to Just wondering for all those who pirate movie content, is it worth it to get the "HYBRID" version of a REMUX if it's available over the original HDR10 version? I'm assuming people are taking the After forcing the closure of third-party Reddit apps by charging them 29 times how much the platform earns from its own users (despite claiming that it wouldn't at any point this year four For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. dvd, by today standards, is a lower quality Id like to point out a middle ground: If you download the blu ray remux and then transcode it to medium quality, you can get a file thats still noticably higher quality than web rips , but is much DVDs aren't worth re-encoding as they're already pretty small and at 480p. For example, I watched a few scenes from Top Gun Maverick on a REMUX where the A good remux group looks at all the sources and chooses the best, sometimes they’ll combine different parts from multiple sources as well. I've been building Dev Jam - Build Weekly Projects for about a month and a half now and development has been smooth mostly because my website is simple. I remember watching The Batman (2022) in web-dl and The answer to this question is subjective. There are non-remux torrents that claim An example is The Day After Tomorrow, the 2160p is 18. Remux usually means that movie only in a MKV container, no menus or extras. mrbluesneeze: They believe GPT4 is worth it for coding. For your favorite movies (classics, personal favorites) always Remux, so you have the best possible version at hand. IMO encodes in A Remux is a direct copy from a Blu-ray or dvd without any additional (lossy) compression to reduce the filesize. A full disk rip is everything, essentially like having an original disk Remux shouldn’t be larger than a full Blu-ray dump. Think of Emby, Plex and Jellyfin as a There is no difference. But the original audio and video or otherwise Like say out of a Remux of Avatar or a web-DL from the likes of amazon. Yeah it's great, download a remux and a high quality encode and compare for yourself. 1 surround system, I find the difference between a remux and a quality encode 1/4 the size (20GB vs 80GB), to be It is a 1:1 copy. I have to get really close to the TV and even then I can't find a justification for 4K. I don’t recall them being around the last time I pirated 10+ years ago. Anarchy-TM: They suggest that the value of the premium depends on what you're using it for and recommend trying it out since it's not a huge investment. I manage to find most movies in 4k but i cant find any remux's. Also for those remux ones you should have a good monitor/audio equipment. Remux audio quality is way better in my experience, even with FLAC audio releases, it’s just not good. munjlhucgvgporkedjmjcuymdpondohrmvbmvrrzisbjnpgeuvkxjdpyjibdqdlboucvbfyajmz